| Marco Musiani, Elisabetta Visalberghi, CNR
Psychology Institute, Department of Comparative Psychology, Via
Aldrovandi 16b, 00197 Rome, Italy; Luigi Boitani, Department of
Animal and Human Biology, Universite di Roma "La Sapienza", Viale
dell'Universite 32, 00185 Rome, Italy
A technique known as fladry was traditionally used to hunt
wolves in Eastern Europe and Russia. It consists of driving wolves
into an enclosure formed by 50 x 10 cm red flags hanging from ropes.
The technique has been employed to livetrap wild wolves in Poland.
The aim of our pilot study was to see whether five captive wolves
living in two enclosures (120 m2 and 850 m2) at the Rome Zoo were
responsive to the device. In particular, we explored the
effectiveness of variations in design attributes (between-flag
distance; rope height; scent; flag movement and colour). We also
tested the effectiveness of fladry to constrain wolf movement
into portions of the enclosures and to prevent wolves from accessing
food.
We found that avoidance was maximal when flags were less than 50
cm apart and their bottom edge was at ground level. With this
design, wolves never crossed red flags (nor grey ones of the same
brightness) intersecting their usual stereotyped routes (baseline:
4.08 +/- 3.11 SD crossings along the routes per min). Flags were not
crossed even when the daily food ration was placed on the opposite
side. In contrast, some crossing occurred when flag distances were
75 cm or more, or rope height was less than 25 cm or more than 75
cm, although wolves avoided these barriers and switched to less
preferred routes (p < 0.0032, X2 > 8.67, df = 1). Disturbance
(visual and/or related to scent) present when we dug holes in the
ground, instead of setting a physical barrier, did not prevent
movements along stereotyped routes (p = 0.1352, X2 = 2.20, df = 1).
Behavioural reactions to flag movement were not noticed.
Our preliminary results indicate that fladry works
effectively on captive wolves at least temporarily (1 hour test).
Further experimental research is needed to evaluate the
effectiveness of these barriers over repeated encounters. In these
conditions, we will assess whether habituation, or other factors
(such as wolves' motivation to cross them), decrease fladry's
effectiveness. In addition to fladry, we will test the
effectiveness of other traditional and new barriers (e.g., electric
fences) to prevent captive wolves from accessing food sources. In
case these experiments provide positive results, the next step
should be to validate in the wild the effectiveness of these
barriers to protect livestock (particularly in areas where conflicts
between wolves and shepherds are arising) and to capture wolves.
|